Maelstrom Research Staging | CoLaus_PsyCoLaus_Adult_offspring_Psychiatric_evaluation_followup

CoLaus_PsyCoLaus_Adult_offspring_Psychiatric_evaluation_followup_2

Networks -

Variables -

Associated study CoLaus|PsyCoLaus Contingency Table

Population

CoLaus|PsyCoLaus - Adult Offspring

The population is composed of the offspring aged 18 to 35 years of the probands.

Selection Criteria

Minimum age

Maximum age

Newborns

Twins

Countries

Switzerland

Ethnic Origin

Health Status

Recruitment

Sources of recruitment

General population

General Population

Selected sample

Supplementary Information

During the third and the fourth physical and psychiatric follow-up evaluation, all participants (probands) of the original cohort were systematically asked whether they would allow the study to contact their offspring in the age range between 18 and 35 years. If they agreed, written consent was requested for each offspring to give the study permission to contact this person. These offspring were then invited by letter to participate. Those who agreed were contacted by a psychologist or study nurse by phone, who provided further information on the study and sent them the detailed information letter and consent forms. Those who completed first the psychiatric evaluation, were contacted by the somatic team in a second step and vice versa.

Number of Participants

Number of Participants: 1,923
Number of Participants with Biological Samples: 998

More info

Data Collection Event

CoLaus|PsyCoLaus - Adult Offsping - Psychiatric evaluation follow-up 2

Personality traits, attitudes, and functioning were assessed through a semi-structured diagnostic interview and a number of self-rating instruments. Diagnostic information was collected using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS). Additional data was collected based on interview techniques, including headache symptoms (Diagnostic Interview for Headache Syndromes (DIHS)) and life events (F. Amiel Lebigre interview). Complementary information on personality, temperamental features, social support, quality of life, job stress, and depression was obtained using a self-report battery including the following instruments: the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), the Hypomania Checklist-32 first revised version (HCL-32-R1), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA), The Maastricht Vital Exhaustion Questionnaire (MVEQ), the Siegrist Job Stress Questionnaire, The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and a Depression screening (CES-D). Cognitive function was assessed using a diverse range of methodologies, including the Do 80 (Epreuve de dénomination orale d’images) Cognitive Complaint Questionnaire, the Grober and Buschke episodic memory test CERAD praxis items, the Lexical and semantic fluency tasks, the Stroop color test, and the Severity staging based on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). This comprehensive approach ensured a thorough understanding of cognitive function in the study participants. Additional phenotypes included an EEG for abnormal functional connectivity and an MRI for brain morphology and noise measurements during sleep.

More info

Collected Dataset / CoLaus_PsyCoLaus_Adult_offspring_Psychiatric_evaluation_followup_2

CoLaus_PsyCoLaus_Adult_offspring_Psychiatric_evaluation_followup_2

Population

CoLaus|PsyCoLaus - Adult Offspring

Data Collection Event

CoLaus|PsyCoLaus - Adult Offsping - Psychiatric evaluation follow-up 2

Files

Variables Classifications